Disappointment in WIAA's Decision on Dual State Wrestling Tournament

“The beauty of this is its simplicity. Once a plan gets too complex, everything can go wrong.” - Walter Sobchak, ‘The Big Lebowski’

As a passionate advocate for wrestling and a coach deeply invested in our sport's growth and development, I am profoundly disappointed by the WIAA Executive Board's decision to deny the proposal for a dual state wrestling tournament. This ruling disregards the considerable time, effort, and thought that many dedicated individuals have put into crafting a viable framework for this event. Nineteen other states already successfully run similar dual state tournaments, and it is disheartening to see our state lagging behind.

Misguided Comparisons and Misunderstandings

The rationale provided by the WIAA is perplexing and, frankly, misguided. Comparing wrestling to volleyball is an absurd analogy. Volleyball is fundamentally a team sport without an individual state competition, unlike wrestling, which uniquely balances both individual and team components. A more appropriate comparison might be cross-country or golf, where individual performances contribute to overall team success.

Inflexible Models and Missed Opportunities

The Board's concern regarding the structure of the Foundation game model not aligning with wrestling's needs reflects a lack of understanding of our sport's dynamics. Wrestling does not fit neatly into a one-size-fits-all model. Our sport requires a flexible approach that recognizes the distinct format and demands of dual meets.

It is also important to note that having only the top two teams compete becomes subjective because individual tournament results do not reflect dual success. Wrestling is unique in that a team with several outstanding individual wrestlers might not perform as well in a dual meet setting, where depth and match-ups play a crucial role. Additionally, holding the dual state tournament during the regular season would minimize the event's significance and impact. A state-level tournament should be a culminating event, not just another date on the regular season calendar.

The suggestion to hold the event during the season and add an extra dual match misses the point of what a state-level dual tournament represents. It is not just another match; it is a unique competition that fosters team spirit and highlights collective effort.

Questions of Authority and Control

Further questions about the potential for other team sports to demand similar events and concerns over control suggest a reluctance to embrace innovation. This dual state tournament proposal was meticulously planned to ensure no entry fees, the awarding of eight team trophies, and a qualification process that would bring together the best teams. The emphasis was on inclusivity, allowing many young wrestlers who might not qualify for the individual Mat Classic to experience the excitement and pride of competing at the state level.

Impact on the Wrestling Community

This decision represents a missed opportunity for our wrestlers. It would have provided a platform for those who may not shine individually but contribute significantly to their team's success. It would have created memories and experiences for countless kids who dream of being part of something bigger than themselves. The value of team competition in wrestling cannot be overstated. It builds camaraderie, teaches invaluable lessons about working towards common goals, and instills a sense of belonging and pride.

Reevaluation?

I urge the WIAA to reconsider their decision in the future. The benefits of a dual state wrestling tournament far outweigh the concerns raised. It is time for the governing body to listen to the voices within the wrestling community who understand the sport's nuances and potential. Let's not stifle innovation and growth because of rigid adherence to models that do not fit all sports equally. Unfortunately, it has been made clear that there will be no reevaluation this year.

Final thoughts

To the dedicated individuals who worked tirelessly on this proposal, and to the wrestlers who would have thrived in this competition, I share your disappointment. Let's continue to advocate for our sport and for opportunities that will enrich the experiences of all our young athletes. The idea is out on a shelf this year, but our wrestlers deserve the chance to compete in a format that celebrates and elevates the team aspect of our beloved sport. Establishing a team state tournament would encourage teams to fill their rosters, fostering growth and enthusiasm for wrestling across our state.

The Dude abides

Next
Next

Workout Wednesday: Find the Zebra in North Bend